DANA MILBANK: Darrell Issa disconnects Democrats



Darrell Issa, chairman of the House committee leading numerous investigations of the Obama administration, found a new way to silence Democratic critics who question his actions: He shut off the microphones.

The California Republican had said that Lois Lerner, a key figure in the IRS targeting of Tea Party groups, would testify before his House Oversight and Government Reform panel on Wednesday, but instead she refused to answer questions. After Issa forced Lerner to invoke her Fifth Amendment rights no fewer than 10 times, the committee’s top Democrat, Elijah Cummings of Maryland, raised his hand to speak.

Issa looked at Cummings, ignored him, adjourned the hearing and slammed down the gavel.

“Mr. Chairman? Mr. Chairman? Mr. Chairman?” Cummings bellowed.

Issa, who was gathering his papers, turned around. “We’ve adjourned,” he said.

“Mr. Chairman, you cannot run a committee like this,” Cummings fumed. “We’re better than that as a committee. I have asked for a few minutes to ask a procedural –”

Issa had stood up and now pressed a button in front of him that silenced Cummings’ microphone.

But the Democrat, who has a booming voice, continued to speak, and the microphones went back on whenever Issa released his override button. Finally, Issa made a throat-slitting gesture to his staff and said, “Close it down.” The sound system went dead.

Issa and fellow Republicans walked off to cries of “Shame!”

“Mr. Chairman,” Cummings called after Issa, “what are you hiding?”

Said Rep. Gerald Connolly, D-Va., “He’s taking the Fifth, Elijah.”

Even by today’s low standard of civility in Congress, calling a hearing and then not allowing minority lawmakers to utter a single word is rather unusual. But Issa, now in the fourth and final year of his chairmanship, is an unusual man.

His latest: speculating at a fundraiser last month that Pentagon assets were not mobilized to protect American facilities in Benghazi, Libya, when they were attacked in 2012 because Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton “told them to stand down.” But the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee found that there were no such orders.

On the IRS, similarly, Issa had said that it was “the targeting of the president’s political enemies effectively and lies about it,” and that he would prove it was directed “out of Washington headquarters.” But Issa has found no such proof.

Issa gave Cummings a look of loathing and said, quietly, “We had a hearing. It is adjourned. I gave you an opportunity to ask a question. You have no question.”

While Cummings continued to read his unamplified statement, Issa walked out and was asked by reporters in the hallway why he shut the sound. “He was actually slandering me at the moment that the mics did go off by claiming that this had not been a real investigation,” Issa said. “This has been a bipartisan investigation.”

Bipartisan: one party to protest, and the other party to unplug the microphones.

Follow Dana Milbank on Twitter, @Milbank.

Click video to hear audio


    As I understand the situation under question, the IRS was barraged with an unprecedented number of political organizations requesting Tax Exempt status, the vast majority being Tea Party organizations. It does bear mentioning that liberal organizations were also under investigation by the IRS at the same time: there just were no where as many of those. I do realize that under pressure the IRS eventually gave Tax Exempt status to these organizations but has anyone investigated if they were actually eligible ? From everything I’ve read so far, the IRS did the right thing in the first place.

  • Ells Worth

    If you are right, Lois Lerner had no reason to invoke the fifth. What have you been reading, the huffington post? I think it is very clear conservatives were attacked by the IRS, many of these that were approved was after the election.