DAVID IGNATIUS: Opportunity and peril over Iran

WASHINGTON – For a weakened but still ambitious President Obama, the biggest foreign-policy opportunity and danger of his presidency rolls into New York next week with the arrival of Iranian leader Hassan Rouhani.

The Iranians have been signaling through various channels that they are ready to discuss a broad security framework – one that would include concessions to limit Iran’s nuclear program short of producing weapons, but would also recognize that the country has interests in Syria and other parts of the Middle East.

Such a comprehensive security framework appeals to prominent U.S. strategists. But it deeply worries regional players in Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, who fear their interests will be sacrificed.

Here’s the way the White House is assessing the diplomatic maneuvers that will begin with Rouhani’s address to the United Nations Tuesday:

• U.S. officials see Rouhani as a stronger leader than his fiery predecessor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, as well as a more moderate one.

• Rouhani has signaled that he’s interested in a nuclear deal. He responded favorably to a private letter from Obama that urged bilateral U.S.-Iranian negotiations, characterizing the message as “positive and constructive” in an interview last Wednesday with NBC News.

• The White House sees an opportunity in Rouhani’s designation of Foreign Minister Javad Zarif as the chief negotiator on the nuclear issue. Zarif, Iran’s former U.N. ambassador, will stay on in New York for an extra week after Rouhani’s visit. U.S. officials might start initial quiet contacts with Zarif during his trip. But officials caution that any nuclear deal must be ratified by the so-called “P5+1” group, which includes Russia and China, because it would require international monitoring.

• The most urgent issue is Syria – and Iran’s possible role at a Geneva conference to negotiate a political transition from President Bashar al-Assad.

Obama concluded this month that he needed Russian help to resolve the Syria problem, and he may make a similar decision about Iran. But U.S. officials wonder whether Rouhani can make policy independent of the Quds Force of the Revolutionary Guards Corps, which has been Tehran’s covert-action arm in Syria, Lebanon, Bahrain and elsewhere.

The opportunity for a breakthrough with Iran after 34 years of isolation is tantalizing for Obama and his foreign-policy team. It’s the sort of big idea that conjures up visions of a new regional order that reconciles the rising revolutionary powers with the status-quo powers, much as the Congress of Vienna did for Europe in 1815.

But for a wounded Obama who lacks a solid, bipartisan foreign-policy consensus, these are giant steps. Israel appears willing to allow more time for diplomacy. But will Saudi Arabia and the Gulf nations stop fulminating about the Iranian menace long enough to consider the shape of a deal? For a battered White House, it’s a time to think big – but mind the vexing little details.

David Ignatius’ email address is davidignatius@washpost.com.

  • guest

    “ wounded Obama who lacks a solid, bipartisan foreign-policy consensus” ???????

    You mean that the Republican Party will automatically be against anything the current President does in order to gain political advantage – regardless of the affect on Americans and the American economy. The House side of Congress has literally done nothing and still looks at the American people with a straight face and claim all the world ills are because of Obama.