Find a BusinessList Your BusinessSee ClassifiedsSubscriptionsNEMISS JobsNEMISS PrepsNEMS HomesNEMS DealsDJournal.com Home

Capitol Blog



Governor doesn't appear to be obstacle
by bobbyharrison
 Capitol Blog
Apr 14, 2009 | 924 views | 4 4 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

 

 

JACKSON -- The fact that Gov. Haley Barbour refused to say during a recent interview how large of a cigarette tax increase would be acceptable to him is at least interesting and might be  enlightening.

House and Senate negotiators are trying to reach a compromise on how much -- if any -- to increase the cigarette tax. Senate negotiators have cited potential Barbour opposition and a possible veto as a reason to keep the tax increase lower than the House leaders want.

In his budget proposal released last year, Barbour called for a modest 24-cent-per-pack increase.

But when asked recently how high of an increase he would accept, Barbour said, "I will sign a bill that has an honest revenue estimate." Based on that answer, Barbour seems more concerned that legislators get as accurate an estimate as possible of how much revenue a cigarette tax would generate and cares less about the size of the increase

People who know the Republican governor understand he is far from a shrinking violet.  He is not shy about voicing his opinion -- especially about possible legislative action he might oppose.

In past years, Barbour has led the successfull effort to prevent the enactment of a cigarette tax increase. But not this year.

The effort to hold down the size of the tax increase is being led right now by Senate leaders and not by Barbour.



Comments
(4)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
mryhenry125
|
April 23, 2009
just what they need to legalize alcohol in Bay springs so more people can drown and get killed in accidents and raise cigerate tax, what about the raindy day fund, what is they plans for it nothing?
Agypsy
|
April 19, 2009
I have been on the same soap box as the first two comments. They didn't mention all the money the state gained from the casinos. Seems to me trimming the fat instead of taxing those that actually work (if still can find work) would be more responsible. I see wrongful use of the Medicaid program daily at my job (medical), as much health issues due to alcohol & obesity as we do smoking.

Rights of business owners have been taken away from them, all over this smoking issue. He buys the lot, pays the mortgage, pays the employees, keeps paying taxes but yet he has no rights as to what patrons he can serve in his own business.

Signs on the front doors would do perfect..either a smoking establishment or non-smoking establisment. Simple, no one would complain about others, he has his rights back, and the areas towns would gain revenue from ALL out of towners coming for a nice night out.

Trim the gov't employees then begin work on the ones out here needing help.
tiredofpromises
|
April 16, 2009
I agree with notstupidyet ... where did all of the money go ... you never hear of anyone in government wanting to raise the taxes on alcohol ... you know I lost a very special person to a drunk driver recently ... I don't think I have ever heard of cigarettes causing a car wreck where someone was serverly wounded or even died ... raise taxes on "booze" and we may see a decline in drunk driving deaths ... and what if everyone who smokes had to quit ... there are medicines available now that most insurance companies pay the entire amount for ... what would they raise next?
notstupidyet
|
April 15, 2009
Come on people ..WAKE UP...Remember when Mike Moore sued the tobacco companies back in the 90's and won millions of dollars.That money was to lower health cost and get more care for patients.Did that happen?....NO...The money went into the general fund to give pay raises to the house and senate members and state employees.Now the tax on tobacco will not be used for anything but pay raises again and anyhting else the house and senate want to use it for.Call your house or senate member and ask them to explain to you where all the money will go and where did the Mike Moore money go.My Doctors cost and hospital cost did not go down.Why not put a tax on people that are obese as to say a $1.oo per pound that a person is overweight.Why not put a $5.00 tax on a six pack of beer or every bottle booze,but then again the house and senate would have to give themselves another raise because they couldn't afford the drinks after meetings.But that is my opinion only.Feel free to post a coment because we are letting certain people tell use we have no rights.