Find a BusinessList Your BusinessSee ClassifiedsSubscriptionsNEMISS JobsNEMISS PrepsNEMS HomesNEMS DealsDJournal.com Home

Capitol Blog



Ward trial jury picks likely today
by Patsy R. Brumfield/NEMS Daily Journal
May 02, 2012 | 3426 views | 8 8 comments | 13 13 recommendations | email to a friend | print
TUPELO - A jury is expected to be selected this morning in the depraved-heart murder trial of Thomas J. Ward of Saltillo.

Circuit Judge James L. Roberts Jr. guided the jury process throughout the day Tuesday at the Lee County Justice Center. He said the trial is likely to last at least this week.

A 100-person jury pool answered roll, with final winnowing questions from the judge and attorneys yielding a 59-person panel from which 12 jurors and three alternates will be chosen.

Ward, who maintains his innocence, was indicted in the 2010 shooting death of 20-year-old Itawamba Community College student Anna Catherine McCoy.

From jury-pool questions by his attorney, Victor Fleitas of Tupelo, it's clear the defense will seek to convince the jury that McCoy's death was a tragic accident, not murder.

Prosecutors are District Attorney Trent Kelly and his assistants, Richard Bowen and Josh Wise.

As the attorneys sought to learn about the prospective jurors, changing communication technology took center stage late Tuesday.

Fleitas spent a long time asking questions about online news readership, and use of social network sites Facebook and Twitter.

Several prospective jurors admitted they were Facebook friends with a few of the state's prospective witnesses, including Lee County Coroner Carolyn Gillentine-Green and McCoy's father, Cotton McCoy.

No possible jurors said they formed any kind of opinions about the case from what they'd read on the Internet, watched on TV or read in the Daily Journal.

Months ago, Fleitas asked the court to move the trial out of Lee County because, he said, of extensive pretrial publicity.

Names of possible witnesses were read by Roberts to determine if anyone in the jury pool knew any of them or were related in some way. Generally, the answers were no.

But in reading out the names, Roberts revealed that controversial medical examiner Dr. Steven Hayne will be among them, as well as both of McCoy's parents and an expert from the National Center for Physical Acoustics at the University of Mississippi, which studies sound.

Among the unusual responses from prospective jurors was from a woman, who said she served last year on a jury drawn from Lee County for a trial in Lafayette County, and that the experience was so emotional for her that she couldn't sleep for a while. She agreed she likely wouldn't be a good juror this time.

patsy.brumfield@journalinc.com
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
JackKevorkian
|
May 02, 2012
turkeyinthestraw:

You, sir, appear to be the know-it-all. As another poster suggested, if you know so much more about the legal community than us average joes, then please post your qualifications and why we should value your opinion over any other?

You have attacked me on this forum before. However, your attacks only consist of juvenile name calling, supposition and inuendo. Back up your facts and quit acting like a 10 year old, or else stay on the porch.
Tupeloboyz
|
May 02, 2012
turkeyinthestraw:

If you are some hot shot lawyer or judge, please let us know so that we will understand the source of your expert inside information on the legal system.

I have never heard of this Mr. Flautas either and I have lived around here for a very long time.

Jim Waide was Tyler Edmonds lawyer as far as I can recall. I never heard of Flautas being involved in that famous case. Honestly, it sounds like a little name dropping to me.
gardenhead
|
May 02, 2012
It actually was Jim Waide, Fleitas, and a third attorney from Florida (can't remember the name, sorry), but there's no doubt that Jim Waide was the lead attorney.
gatekeeper97
|
May 02, 2012
Fleitas has been here for several years. The only reason I know him is when we went to awards ceremonies at the schools, his son won most of the academic awards. A really bright kid. Suppose his dad is probably the same.
Tricks4u
|
May 02, 2012
From what I know personally about the Ward family, he could have hired any attorney he wanted financially speaking. That being said, Fleitas must be a pretty good lawyer.
JackKevorkian
|
May 02, 2012
Respectfully, who is this Victor Fleitas lawyer? Honestly, I have never heard of him before.

It is a shame that justice is bought and sold in our legal system, but it is. Those that have money can get the best lawyers and will normally get off scott free. On the other hand, those that do not have money get stuck with no-name, overworked pubic defenders and will usually pay the price in the end. How is that fair?

For instance, if this guy would have had the money to hire a Tony Farese or a Jimmy Doug Shelton, he would probably beat this rap in no time flat. But from what I have read so far, his goose may be cooked. DA Kelly and his staff make a formidible team.

This is a very sad case. I hope that somehow justice prevails and all of these families can find closure in the end.
lady78
|
May 02, 2012
I totally agree, it is so sad that our Justice system is there to serve Justice, but somehow it serves more of an Injustice than anything else. This is a very sad case, due to the people involved there is no way this guy will get a fair trial.

turkeyinthestraw
|
May 02, 2012
It's very obvious that you know nothing of the local legal system. Just because you, a no-name, overworked average Joe, do not know Victor Fleitas does not mean he is not a capable and smart attorney. How dare you cast aspersions on a man and subject for which you have no knowledge. Your obvious ignorance of all things legal is evident in your sullied commentary(and, indeed, quite comical). For your information and others of your ilk, Fleitas happened to represent Tyler Edmonds when Edmonds was acquitted--no easy feat. You need to stick to subjects for which you have knowledge (if there are any) and quit trying to act like a big-shot-know-it-all on subjects for which you have none.