Find a BusinessList Your BusinessSee ClassifiedsSubscriptionsNEMISS JobsNEMISS PrepsNEMS HomesNEMS DealsDJournal.com Home

Capitol Blog



Governor wants more tobacco taxes, some question motive
by bobbyharrison
 Capitol Blog
May 12, 2009 | 1323 views | 2 2 comments | 6 6 recommendations | email to a friend | print | permalink

 

JACKSON -- Haley Barbour, who has spent much of his tenure as governor blocking efforts to increase Mississippi's cigarette tax, is expected to sign the 50-cent-per-pack increase approved last week by the Legislature.

But now, surprise, surprise, the Republican governor says that is not enough. He wants additional taxes on tobacco products.

Barbour has been advocating this session an additional tax on the companies that did not participate in the settlement of a lawsuit the state filed against some tobacco companies in the 1990s. These smaller companies can sell cigarettes cheaper, Barbour says, because they are not making annual payments to the state as part of the lawsuit settlement.

He also wants smokeless tobacco to be taxed by weight instead of a percentage of its price.

In both instances, Barbour says it is a matter of tax fairness. And both proposals will provided additional revenue to the state.

In both cases, Barbour has points. As a matter of fact, in the past, the House Democratic leadership has tried to increase the tax on the smaller, non-participating cigarette companies and that effort was blocked by Barbour's Republican allies in the Legislature.

Now Barbour is for it, but the House Democratic leadership is against it.

It doesn't help Barbour's cause that the big tobacco companies favor both of his proposals and that they would be helped financially if the governor's proposals passed.

It is not forgotten that Barbour for years lobbied for big tobacco companies and that the Washington, D.C., lobbying firms he still receives payments from continues to  lobby for big tobacco.

In essence, some legislators believe the governor is for the additional taxes only to help big tobacco companies.

But another alternative may be that Barbour  has come to the conclusion the additional tobacco taxes are good public policy whether big tobacco is for them or not.

Comments
(2)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
bhdhwh
|
May 13, 2009
Why do the smokers have to pay for everything? It is not right that you can go into any almost any restaurant in Lee County and drink as much alcohol as you want, but don't you dare light up!

I would rather get in the vehicle with someone who is smoking than someone who has had a few drinks. Who do these high and might people think they are to make decisions for other people? I for once wish someone in the government had some backbone and would stand up for us little people. I for one no longer shop in Lee County since they passed the no smoking ban. My husband and I both have given up other items in order to keep supporting the tobacco industry.
builderproschoice
|
May 13, 2009
Gov. Haley Barbour is an owner of the parent company of lobbying firm Barbour Griffith & Rogers Inc. and he receives a pension and profit-sharing plan benefits from it. Some of the proceeds of the firm's lobbying activitiesare deposited intoBarbour's investment account. According to Barbour's attorney, a blind trust executed in 2004 prevents Barbour from knowing the composition of his investments in order to eliminate any conflicts of interest.

In 2001, Fortune Magazine named Barbour Griffith & Rogers Inc. as the most powerful obbying firm in America. BG&R Inc. has made millions of dollars lobbying on behalf of the tobacco industry.

I personally voted for Governor Haley Barbour.